Tuesday, 11 September 2007
CPSU launches TV ads
Watch the CPSU ad on YouTube here.
CPSU National Secretary Stephen Jones said: "The CPSU has decided to launch these TV advertisements to portray a more realistic face of modern unionism. "At a time when the Howard Government and militant employers are attempting to narrowly stereotype all unionists as overweight men in braces, the ad reinforces that the typical union member these days is a semi-professional, white collar worker looking for practical advice and support at work.
"This unusual step also reflects the fact that in the current industrial climate, union representatives find it extremely difficult to get into workplaces to talk with employees about their issues and the benefits of union membership. "This is an historic initiative. It's the first time unions have marketed the benefits of membership in the mass media via a TV campaign. "It's a positive campaign that links the individual 'value' in joining a union with the collective 'values' of working together.
"The ads are based on extensive research that shows that most workers are not opposed to the idea of union, but unions really need to do a better job of communicating to potential members the benefits of membership.
"These benefits include support at the workplace level if things go wrong, assistance in bargaining wages and conditions as well discounts on travel and home loans.
Monday, 27 August 2007
Take Cover! CPSU to provide free journey cover insurance for union members
Among many other changes, the Government removed workers' compensation cover for public servants who are injured while travelling to or from home to work.
As this part of the CPSU's campaign against the Howard Government's changes, the CPSU has decided to introduce its own 'income maintenance insurance' for union members. The idea is to provide a 'safety net' while the campaign for a better deal continues.
To read more, click here.
What do you think about CPSU providing journey cover insurance to its members? Have your say below?
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
Changing the channel
SBS news anchor and founding board member, Mary Kostakidis, is reportedly suing SBS for breach of contract after long standing disagreements with management about the future and direction of the public broadcaster.
The walkout by the ‘face of SBS’ has shed some public light on what SBS staff say is a significant and worrying shift in the culture of the multicultural broadcaster.
What do you think?
Have you noticed changes at SBS? Have your say below.
Tuesday, 21 August 2007
Workers’ compensation – ALP responds to members’ concern
Many CPSU members are concerned about the federal government's changes to workers’ compensation laws and have asked about the Labor Party’s views on these changes.
In response to questions from CPSU members, Labor leader Kevin Rudd replied:
Thank you for your letter regarding changes to the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act. As you may be aware these were debated in the Parliament last year and this year and make significant changes to:
• the definition of disease, so that employment must now make a “significant”, rather than “material”, contribution to a disease for it to be compensable;
• the definition of “injury” so as to exclude injuries arising from “reasonable administrative action taken in a reasonable manner” and expand the exclusionary provisions for stress claims to include performance appraisals and counselling in relation to performance; and
• the scope of work-related journeys so that claims for non work-related journeys and recess breaks are no longer covered, representing a significant cost shift on to state governments’ compulsory third party claims.
In all these cases, the changes have had the effect of narrowing the circumstances in which employees may claim compensation. In fact the Government’s Explanatory Memorandum to the Bill stated this was an explicit objective of the changes – noting: “the Government is seeking to significantly amend the legislation to reflect its desire to decrease the number of injuries covered by the Scheme”.
Labor opposed these changes in the Parliament because they are not in the interests of working Australians. Just like the Howard Government’s WorkChoices laws, these changes strip away the terms and conditions of our public sector work force.
These changes also come at a time when private sector firms operating in blue collar areas such as transport and construction such are being encouraged to migrate to the traditionally white collar Comcare scheme. Labor is concerned that the Howard Government is sacrificing protections for workers in order to cut its costs.
Strong protection of occupational health and safety should not be compromised. Labor believes that appropriate compensation and implementing a non-adversarial approach to injury prevention and workplace safety is essential.
Further to Labor’s commitment at National Conference, Labor will be developing its workplace health and safety policy and will be making announcements on this issue in the future.
Kind regards,
Kevin Rudd
Federal Labor Leader
Member for Griffith
Wednesday, 8 August 2007
A very public servant
Unless you've been living under a rock in the Pilbara for the last few weeks, you would have seen, heard or read one of the Howard Government's new 'Know Where You Stand' advertisements, fronted by Barbara Bennett from the Workplace Authority.
Are you concerned at the use of a public servant in such a political marketing campaign?
Does this sort of advertising damage the independence and integrity of the public service?
Tell us what you think about the Government's ads.
Thursday, 26 July 2007
The kids aren't all right
Recent polling has shown significant numbers of young voters are drifting away from the Government because of its controversial workplace laws.
Internal Coalition research shows that more than 10% of 25-34 year-old voters have shifted their support away from the Government and towards Kevin Rudd.
The report identified the Government's poor handling of workplace relations and climate change as the two key vote-changers among younger people.
"It's no surprise that WorkChoices is unpopular with young people," says CPSU National Secretary Stephen Jones. "Young workers are already vulnerable and have only limited bargaining power. Under WorkChoices they can be left completely exposed."
Stephen Jones points to recent examples of young workers getting the short end of the WorkChoices stick, such as:
* teenage staff on AWAs at Chili's restaurant chain who were required to use their own money to cover customers who skipped out without paying the bill
* hospitality staff at the Mean Fiddler Hotel losing public holiday penalty rates on Anzac Day, while their employer continued to impose a 10% surcharge on patrons
* call centre operator Excellior using WorkChoices to reduce pay rates and conditions of its young workforce in Bendigo and the Gold Coast.
"Parents with kids entering the workforce are deeply concerned that the current workplace laws offers them little protection from unscrupulous employers. How would you feel if your kids were treated this way,?" said Mr Jones..
"We are encouraging workers of all ages to ensure they are correctly enrolled to vote at the coming election. The outcome of this election will not only determine what sort of workplaces current employees have, but the shape of employment conditions for generations of future workers.
"At the last election no-one got to vote on WorkChoices. This time we do," said Mr Jones.
Have your say - post your comments below.
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
Is John Howard awake or asleep on climate change?
John Howard asleep on climate change?
John Howard awake on climate change?
Thursday, 12 July 2007
Young workers burnt by Chili's individual contracts
In addition to picking up the tab of customers who do a runner, the young workers were expected to kick in $50 of their own money at the beginning of each shift for cash floats.
Employees would only start to get paid once customers arrived, with some waiting up to 45 minutes after clocking on before the $13.44* per hour started to kick in.
Many were often only offered shifts that lasted two hours in total. "Most of the time I was given only two-hour shifts, meaning I got just $26.88 a night," former employee Alice McCarthy told the Daily Telegraph.
"I was excited to land a job at Chili's...(but) sadly, my enthusiasm and excitement over my new job was quickly dampened by the harsh realities of the conditions of my employment," she said.
"I didn't really understand the implications of the AWA at first, " Alice said. "I thought it would not really make a difference to my working conditions. I also believed that the whole fuss about the WorkChoices laws was created by politicians wanting votes. But I was wrong because the AWA I had signed really did make a difference to the job."
The ACTU described the situation as "further evidence of how vulnerable young workers have lost rights under John Howard's IR laws," as they launched a new advertisement highlighting the growing concerns of older Australians and working parents.
The ad portrays three generations of the same Australian family, with a grandfather character explaining that his generation 'fought for things like regular working hours, penalty rates and redundancy pay' while his daughter and grandson worry they are losing their rights at work.
"There are very strong concerns about the IR laws among older Australians and parents who are worried about how their children are being treated in the workplace under the new IR laws," ACTU President Sharran Burrow said.
* Following a recent decision by the Fair Pay Commission, the minimum wage will jump to $13.92, effective 1 October 2007.
Your say on new ACTU ads
In the first ad, Annette Harris talks about her experience at Spotlight where she was offered an AWA individual contract that removed penalty rates, overtime and meal breaks - all for an extra 2 cents an hour.
In the second ad, a grandfather talks about how - under WorkChoices - his children and grandchildren have lost the workplace rights his generation had fought so hard for.
Spolight on fairness: Annette Harris ad.
Grand dad ad.
Wednesday, 4 July 2007
Anger as workers' insurance reduced
Thursday, 28 June 2007
First class tax-payers, second class citizens
The report Same-Sex: Same Entitlements details the systematic discrimination of same-sex couples. It found that 58 federal laws deny at least 20,000 same sex couples and their children financial and work related entitlements, entitlements that are freely available to opposite-sex couples and their children.
We expressed our concern at the increased push for terms and conditions to be moved from highly transparent and legally enforceable collective agreements into less transparent and unenforceable policy.
We also identified that the increased use of Australian Workplace Agreements (AWA's), which are not subject to public scrutiny, could increase the risk of discriminatory arrangements.
Last week, the Government announced a Senate Inquiry into the provision of the Superannuation Amendment Bill. The Bill does establish a number of changes to Commonwealth public sector superannuation which the CPSU supports.
However, if a few additional simple amendments to the Bill were introduced, it would be possible to prevent same-sex couple discrimination entirely and the CPSU will raise these in the Inquiry.
After the HREOC report was published, the Prime Minister stated that while his government did not support discrimination, it would not be rushed to act to rectify the situation.
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
Access Card - what does it mean to your work and privacy?
The Department previously planned to begin registrations for the card next April, but now says this will not happen before late 2008. The Access Card is intended to replace the Medicare and other benefits cards, supposedly simplifying access to a wide range of Government health and welfare services.
Aspects of the plan, which has already cost $41 million, has been questioned by the CPSU, opposition political parties and privacy groups.
“This issue has the capacity to profoundly change the way public services are delivered in Australia,” said CPSU National Secretary Stephen Jones.
“There are implications in this for CPSU members both in their work and in their rights as citizens. Regardless of the outcome of the election, the challenges new technology presents for the delivery of public service is not going to go away.
“We will consult with CPSU members and both sides of politics about about the Access card over the coming months to ensure the voice of those tasked with administering the card is heard and noted,” said Mr Jones.
Prior to the recently announced delay the Department said it would register 32,000 residents a day between 2008 and 2010. CPSU has already raised concerns about a number of potential issues such as Sunday opening, how to manage the increased workload, training, and the short term nature of this work.
Once the relevant legislation has been enacted the card will be compulsory for federal welfare and health benefits recipients. For this reason some privacy and civil rights organisations maintain the Access card amounts to a de facto national identity card.
http://www.accesscard.gov.au/
Monday, 18 June 2007
Telstra bullying staff: Tough Call
These are issues that members in Telstra - and many other CPSU workplaces - have been campaigning around for many years. We are encouraging members and supporters who have seen the program to post a comment below.
Thursday, 14 June 2007
UNION TALKS TO MEMBERS... SHOCK!
Over the last two years union members and supporters have been campaigning hard against WorkChoices.
We've conducted surveys and polls, put out emails, press releases and bulletins, held workplace and community meetings, worn tempory tattoos, baked orange cakes, organised massive rallies and even funded prime-time TV ads.
Despite this highly visible approach, the Howard Government claims the Your Rights at Work campaign is a secret, sinister and undemocratic plot by "union bosses" to "steal control of the country" and "ruin the economy."
Incredibly, the Government is arguing that union representatives shouldn't even be talking with their members about the most profound change to their workplace rights in 100 years.
So as the pre-election rhetoric heats up, it's important to remember what this campaign about... unfair workplace laws.
WorkChoices is an attack on the working conditions of millions of working Australian families. Despite the Government's theatrics, the fact remains that under WorkChoices:
- overtime and penalty rates are being cut;
- workers are being dismissed unfairly;
- collective bargaining is being undermined;
- the independent umpire is being sidelined;
- new starters are being forced onto AWAs.
This is why we'll be talking with CPSU members who live in key marginal seats. What happens in those seats will determine the outcome of the election.
The overwhelming majority of members we've contacted so far have been more than happy to have their say.
If people don't want to talk about WorkChoices - for whatever reason - we fully respect their decision not to participate.
Fair workplace rights will be a key election issue. Which means the CPSU has an obligation to find out what our members think, and argue for it passionately.
It's called democracy. It's a union thing.
Push It – campaign for paid maternity leave
Australia is one of only two developed nations – the other being the USA – that does not provide paid maternity leave. Ironically Australia once led the world on this issue, having introduced a maternity allowance in 1912.
Today’s rally was organised by Marie Claire magazine and speakers included the NSW Minister for Women Verity Firth, Democrats Senator Natasha Stott—Despoja and Marie Claire editor Jackie Frank.
In an impassioned speech Ms Firth pointed out that under WorkChoices the situation for women wanting to have children is even more difficult than ever before.
See here for further information.
Have your say: Most CPSU members are already entitled to paid maternity leave but this is not the case in the wider community, with two-thirds of women having no access to any paid maternity leave. Should the Government extend paid maternity leave to all women in the workforce? Post a comment below.
Thursday, 7 June 2007
What's so fair about that?
The changes have been rightly dismissed as cynical pre-election window-dressing.
We reckon if the Government is really serious about fairness in the workplace, there are plenty of issues to tackle... and we've put together a short list.
Compensation: Recent Government changes mean over 100,000 staff have lost workers compensation coverage for journeys to and from the office. The change does nothing to make workplaces safer and simply shifts the costs and risks from employer to employee.
Unfair dismissals: The Howard Government’s laws exclude over four million Australians from unfair dismissal protection, simply because their employer has fewer than 100 employees. Under WorkChoices employers with more than 100 staff can use the 'operational grounds' loophole to sack workers and avoid an unfair dismissal claim.
Working Hours: According to ABS figures, almost a third of Australian employees work unsocial hours - between 7pm and 7am - and most have no say about when they start or finish. About half of the 37 per cent of employees who work overtime do so for no extra pay. None of which will be a surprise to the tens of thousand of CPSU members already struggling to balance their work and home lives.
Collective bargaining: Under WorkChoices, employers hold all the cards. Even where a majority of employees vote in favour of making a collective agreement, employers can ignore your wishes and offer individual contracts, or simply refuse to negotiate. Ironically the Government are now spending big money promoting collective bargaining to small businesses as way to ensure they are not disadvantaged by larger and more powerful businesses. So collective bargaining - sticking together to get a fair deal - is a good idea for small business, but somehow not for employees.
AWAs: In a growing number of public service agencies, new employees are denied the opportunity to choose between collective agreements or AWA individual agreements. And in some workplaces AWAs continue to be used to undermine collective agreements, not to improve pay and conditions.
Have your say:Is the Government doing enough to address the issues that matter to you? Are there other issues they need to address? Post a comment
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
The real cost of soldiering on...
Management pressure on employees to 'soldier on' at work when they are unwell is costing the Australian economy almost four times as much as absenteeism, according to a recent survey.
The report commissioned by Medibank Private, claims that 'presenteeism' - the lost of productivity that occurs when employees attend work while not fully functioning -is contributing to a $25 billion dollar black hole in lost productivity every year.
The health insurer estimates the annual cost to the economy of 'soldiering on' is almost four times that of absenteeism, only $7 billion by comparison.
Read more here and leave a comment below.
Crossing the line
The removal of journey claims from workers compensation rules is fuelling confusion in public service ranks with employees and managers unsure exactly where coverage begins and ends.
A recent case in Victoria exposed one of the 'grey areas' created by the Governments recent cuts to the compensation scheme for Australian public servants.
Read more here and post your thoughts below.
TRENT SMITH'S WITCH-HUNT
Trent Smith was dismissed from his Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAT) job last July after being accused of acting politically when he advised an Opposition staffer to check the Hansard record of Parliamentary proceedings and other public sources of information.
The case has taken 4½ years and involved DFAT trawling through 8000 emails and spending a million dollars of tax-payers' money.
Learn more here and post a comment below. Check out recent media reports here.
DFAT-sacking-a-gross-overreaction
Diplomat-threatened-dfat-head-court-told
Govt should drop witch-hunt and reinstate Trent Smith now (CPSU media release)
DFAT-may-probe-spys-suicide
Bureaucrats-agog-at-evidence-of-skulduggery-in-ranks
Govt witness contradicts himself at unfair dismissal hearing
Diplomat-drops-more-bombshells
Envoys-past-faces-tough-scrutiny
Diplomat-tells-of-46m-in-bank-account
Key Govt witness admits being mystery source
Diplomat-tells-of-giving-loans-to-thai-drug-dealers
Working round the clock
As the Howard Government seeks to soothe unease about its workplace laws, a Bureau of Statistics survey reveals the deep incursion work has already made into family and community life.
The figures show 37 per cent of employees work overtime or extra hours - and about half of them do so for no extra pay. Three in five said they had no say about when they started or finished.
Download the ABS report here and please post a comment.
Thursday, 17 May 2007
‘Our employees voluntarily choose AWAs' - Trujillo
Sol Trujillo: 'Our employees enter into these agreements voluntarily'
Not surprisingly, he's all for them and reckons everyone on one is too. "Our employees choose to enter into these agreements and they do it voluntarily," Mr Trujillo said.
Tripped up by new compo rules
Flashy ads for Join2Win
Find out more about the Join2Win campaign by clicking here.
Watch the Flash ads clicking here and here.
What do you think of the ads? Post your comments below.
Behind the Bastard Boys
Monday, 7 May 2007
Will Labor fix the compo crisis?
There is growing resentment in the public sector about new Government legislation which removes the right to claim workers' compensation for injuries sustained travelling to and from work; during lunch and other breaks. The new laws also make it much harder for workers with stress-related injuries to get the support they need.
However at ALP National Conference last weekend, a motion was passed to reintroduce income protection for public sector employees who are injured travelling to and from work or during breaks. "...Labor will reintroduce income protection by amending the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act for the purposes of employees who are injured travelling to and from work and during breaks in working hours..."
The ALP announcement is a step in the right direction, but we need push the Opposition harder on the fine details. This is a very complex matter and the devil will be in the detail. We are urging members to send an online message of encouragement to the ALP.
Keeping the Pressure on the Govt too! As well as encouraging the ALP to do the right thing, CPSU members are also urged to contact the Liberal and National MPs and Senators who supported the unfair changes to let them know how you feel. Follow this link to find contact details for your local Liberal / National MPs and Senators.
Read a passionate letter from a Defence worker to his local member.
Friday, 4 May 2007
Howard's new fairness test falls well short
The Government is just tinkering around the edges of WorkChoices with the announcement of a 'fairness test' for AWAs. What's needed is a meaningful, legislated guarantee that would ensure no workers would be worse off by signing an AWA, compared to their Award or Collective Agreement.
If the Government is fair-dinkum about a 'fairness test' they should legislate for a meaningful test, rather than the half-measures announced today.
The new fairness test only applies to the nine 'protected' award conditions. This means important employment conditions outside the nine - such as redundancy entitlements / family friendly arrangments - will still be under threat from AWAs.
Download Government media release and full document.
Read media reports: Hockey denies public pressure led to WorkChoices scale back ABC online IR backflip is 'desperate', says Labor The Age online
What do you think? Please leave a comment.
Monday, 30 April 2007
ALP's IR policy revealed
Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard fleshed out the ALP's proposed industrial relations policies at Labor's National Conference over the last few days.
Click here for Kevin Rudd's "Forward with Fairness" speech to ALP National Conference on 28th April 2007
Click here for Julia Gillard's "Forward with Fairness" speech to ALP National Conference on 28th April 2007
Click here for Kevin Rudd's and Julia Gillard's "Federal Labor's Fair And Balanced Industrial Relations Policy" joint statement released on 28th April 2007
Tell us what you think
What do you think about the ALP's proposed changes to industrial relations laws? Post your comments below.
Join2Win campaign kicks off
More than 500 activists have signed up to CPSU’s Join2Win initiative - a key part of the union’s Rights at Work campaign in this election year.
Thirty-second radio ads promoting the value of union membership are currently running in Canberra as part of the CPSU's Join2Win initiative. You can listen to the radio ads here and here (mp3 format)
Join2Win aims to give activists the skills and support they need to get the message out in their communities; and to build support for the union in their workplaces.
In coming months these 500+ people will be talking with members and potential members about the urgent need to join the union and vote for fair workplace rights.
For more information or to join the campaign online click here
Already signed up to Join2Win?
Share your Join2Win experiences by posting a comment below.
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
Rudd reveals part of his IR agenda
It includes introducing a national IR system for the private sector, abolishing AWA's, outlawing strikes without secret ballots, and re-introducing streamlined unfair dismissal laws.
The ACTU says its "a good start". Workplace Relations Minister Joe Hockey called it a "donkey", while business groups remain "luke-warm".
But what do you think? Please post a comment.
Monday, 26 March 2007
WorkChoices: one year on
This week marks the one-year anniversary of 'WorkChoices' - the Howard Government's radical rewrite of Australia's industrial relations (IR) laws. After twelve months, we want to know what you think about the new laws. Please take a minute to vote in our snap poll here and post a comment about the new laws.
More information
ACTU fact-sheet: IR laws 1 year on
download
ACTU full report: IR laws 1 year on
download
Thursday, 22 March 2007
CPSU welcomes ALP broadband plan and PS super guarantee
A future Labor government would finance it through the $2 billion Communications Fund and the Future Fund's 17% stake in Telstra.
The plan also includes a similar investment from a company such as Telstra or Optus, bringing the total outlay to around $8 billion.
It would connect 98% of Australians at more than 40 times present speeds.
"This will help build and strengthen the economy and create employment throughout the country," said Mr Jones.
"For far too long Australia has lagged behind other developed countries in bandwidth. The ALP's plan to build a high-speed network will redress this imbalance and help ensure economic prosperity long beyond the resources boom.
"This is the sort of forward thinking plan that has been sorely lacking from government. And, as high users of information technology services both at work and home, CPSU members will greatly benefit from this plan," said Mr Jones.
Mr Jones also welcomed Kevin Rudd's guarantee that the retirement provisions for public servants are fully protected.
"The CPSU is satisfied that public service superannuation liabilities will be fully met under the Future Fund and that the money invested in the broadband plan will benefit the whole country and economy. This is a plan with nation building at its core. It should be supported by all sides of politics," said Mr Jones.
More information: Public super 'covered' in $4.7bn broadband plan from The Australian.
Click below to have your say.
Friday, 16 March 2007
CPSU launches Join2Win
With the 2007 Federal Election on the horizon, it is more important than ever that CPSU members stand up for their rights at work to protect pay, conditions and to provide job security for themselves, their families and their communities.
Join2Win aims to have 500 members signed up in March and April this year to have conversations about the importance of joining their union and voting for their rights at work. Each of these members will pledge to recruit at least two new members each.
Regardless of whether you are a CPSU activist or a recently joined member, everyone who participates in Join2Win will be supported. Members who sign up will have access to training and resources such as t-shirts, badges, stickers and flyers. They will also have the full support of CPSU organisers throughout the Join2Win campaign.
To find out more about Join2Win click here or to sign up to participate, click here.
Have you signed up to Join2Win? Tell us your experiences below.
Friday, 9 March 2007
Survey says... hands off our compo rights
* removal of compensation protection for injuries sustained during travel to and from work;
* removal of coverage for accidents during lunch and other breaks, or during lunch-time sporting activities.
* harsher claim assessments for workers suffering from psychological and stress related conditions
* an expanded list of management actions that can be potentially excluded from future claims
"At times I like to take a walk during breaks or ride my bike, promoting a healthy lifestyle. What am I to do if I have a serious fall or hit by another person?" asked one Medicare employee.
"Many of my staff travel interstate for meetings. Will they be covered on their way to the meeting locations, no matter how they travel, and on their return?" asked Veronica, a public servant.
"The Government is using these changes simply to cut costs rather than taking positive steps to ensure public sector workers work in an safe and healthy environment," he said.
Send a protest letter
Complete our brief online survey
Read other members comments
Read the ALP's position.
Download and distribute a bulletin
Keep up to date with all the latest compo news
Have your say on the new ACTU WorkChoices ads
The new ads reveal how AWA's are being used to reduce many employment conditions including: overtime, penalty rates, annual leave loading, public holiday pay, shift allowances and rest breaks.
What do you think about the ads? Check out the ad on YouTube below and post your comments below.
Media report: ACTU probes details of AWAs (from ABC online)
Thursday, 22 February 2007
ADDING INSULT TO INJURY
Did you know the Howard Government has just endorsed new laws which radically reduce workers’ compensation rights in the public sector?
The wide-ranging changes will affect public servants who drive, use public transport, ride bicycles or walk to or from work.
They will also make work-related injury claims more costly, contentious and complicated. We need your help to raise awareness about the issue your workplace.
Follow the links to find out more, complete our survey and send a protest letter.
Wednesday, 14 February 2007
The challenges ahead in 2007
This year will be crucial - not just for the union movement but for all Australians.
The federal election - which is expected in about seven months - represents a turning point for Australian Society.
Do we accept the continued denigration of worker’s rights under the current Coalition Government or is Australia a country that still believes in the fair go?
CPSU has consulted widely with members, delegates and activists about alternatives to the Government's extreme WorkChoices legislation.
The message we are getting back is loud, clear and unmistakable - people do care about their rights at work, a fair go and want a system that benefits the employee as well as the employer.
We will continue to consult with members both in face-to-face meetings and through phone conversations. In marginal seats CPSU members and supporters are banding together to ensure the issue of worker's rights is front and centre in the minds of candidates from all parties.
CPSU will also continue to support the ACTU's Your Rights at Work campaign to get rid of the utterly unfair WorkChoices.
More than 70 new agreements are to be negotiated this year - in agencies large, medium and small including Immigration and Citizenship, the Department of Health and Ageing, ACT Government, NT Government, the National Maritime Museum, Australian Federal Police and Medibank Private to name just a few.
At the same time as we are winning new agreements, we will also be focusing on enforcing existing ones.
We now know that under WorkChoices winning a good agreement is only half the battle. Thanks to the Howard Government's IR laws, employers have more opportunity than ever to wriggle out of commitments or undercut collective agreements.
In fact - to protect your pay, conditions and rights at work - it has never been more important to stick with the union.
As well as workplace laws and bargaining, CPSU members and supporters will face other challenges and opportunities this year including changes to super, workers' comp and OHS, attacks on the public sector, as well as the fallout from the federal election.
CPSU Governing Council - 70 workplace representatives directly elected by you - is meeting in March to determine the union's policy and priorities for the next 12 months.
There is no doubt 2007 is shaping up to be one of the busiest ever for CPSU members. But I am confident that with the right plan - and your ongoing support - we will not only survive 2007 but grow, so we can continue to make a positive difference in workers' lives.
If you are not a member, you can find out about joining today here or by calling 1300 137 636.
Please feel free to post your comments below.
In unity,
Stephen Jones
CPSU National Secretary
Thursday, 25 January 2007
Maritime Museum strike action on target
On the eve of Australia Day, CPSU members gathered around the entrance of the museum and entertained visitors with colorful banners and union sea shanties (“what shall we do with a bad employer?”). A corporate ‘pirate’ was also on hand to make honest employees walk the plank. Click here to see photos from the day.
While the strike activities were lighthearted, the decision to take industrial action was a serious one. After their agreement expired in June 2006, Museum management continued to frustrate the bargaining process by delaying negotiations and failing to reply to correspondence. Management also refused to meet with staff and CPSU representatives.
As a result of the industrial action, Museum management agreed to recommence negotiations for a fair and reasonable union collective agreement. Both CPSU and management have committed to lodging an in-principle agreement by the end of February.
CPSU National Secretary Stephen Jones said that going on strike was the last resort for the staff members’.
"These CPSU members tried time and time again to reason with management, they did all the right things, but got nowhere,” Jones said.
“Museum management admitted they were under pressure from the Government to reduce conditions and offer AWAs. This is just another example of how John Howard's radical new workplace laws are affecting everyone in the community.”
Click here to send your letter to support to ANMM staff members, find out more information about the campaign or post your feedback on our blog.